Friday, August 26, 2011

The Five Most Common Political Systems Around the World

By Phillip Donavan

When we speak of political systems, it’s difficult to determine what the most common types are. After all, many political systems are similar, or have similar roots. Many countries actually have republics of some kind — variants of democracy. As you study political science, it can be helpful to understand some of the most common types of political systems from around the world.

Understanding different political systems is important. Each political system has its advantages and disadvantages. It is worth considering the merits of other political systems, and perhaps incorporating some of the ideas into your own system. Some of the five more common political systems around the world include:

  1. Democracy
  2. Republic
  3. Monarchy
  4. Communism
  5. Dictatorship
Here are some overviews of these five fairly recognizable political systems:

1. Democracy



We often hear the United States referred to as a democracy. Indeed, many refer to the U.S. as a representative democracy. A democracy in a more traditional sense is a political system that allows for each individual to participate. There are two rather popular types of democracy:
  • Direct Democracy: Many scholars point to Athens as an example of direct democracy. Technically, every citizen has an equal say in the workings of government. (The qualifications for being considered a citizen are completely different.) Citizens could show up at a meeting, and then directly participate in the governing process, and the process of making laws.
  • Representative Democracy: In a representative democracy set-up, citizens elect representatives who actually make the law. The United States operates similarly to this principle. Citizens elect legislators who, in turn, make laws. In the U.S., even the president isn’t elected directly; representatives called electors make the decision (although designated electors usually vote according to the wishes of the citizens in their states).
Other types of democracy include versions known as deliberative democracy, in which citizens approach decision making by considering different viewpoints and options, as well as democratic socialism, in which citizens help make decisions or vote for policies that are socialistic in nature. There are other types of democracy as well. The defining characteristic is some level of citizen participation in the political system.

2. Republic



In theory, a republic is a political system in which the government remains mostly subject to those governed. Some scholars define any political system in which the citizens legitimize the government. As such, some (including Montesquieu) consider the U.S. a republic. Indeed, there are those that believe that any form of government that is not based on heritage or authoritarian governance. In some cases, a representative democracy (or any form of democracy) might be considered a republic. Some of the types of republics that you might see include:
  • Crowned (a constitutional monarchy might be considered a crowned republic)
  • Single Party
  • Capitalist
  • Federal (the United States is often referred to as a federal republic)
  • Parliamentary
The main characteristic of a republic is that the government is subject to the people, and leaders can be recalled. Some even make the argument that an oligarchy, which is rule by a few citizens, or a group of citizens, is a form of republic, since the government is subject to some of the wishes of some of the governed.

3. Monarchy



When most of us think of a monarchy, we think of the political systems of medieval European countries. In a monarchy, a ruler is not usually chosen by the voice of the people or their representatives. Often a monarch is the head of state until he or she abdicates or until death. In many cases a monarch is the final word in government. There may be functionaries to make decisions and run the political system, but the monarch has discretion with the laws, and how they are enforced.

However, as with other political systems, there are different types of monarchies. The type that many of us think of as common is the absolute monarchy, in which the monarch truly has the ultimate say in matters of government. However, most monarchies in political systems today do not follow this method. Many of them, especially in the developed world, have limits. Constitutional monarchies fall into this category (and are sometimes considered republics as well). In this type of monarchy, the ruler is the head of state, but a constitution limits the power, and others make laws. The U.K., Denmark, Kuwait, Spain, Sweden, Tuvalu, and many more are examples of constitutional monarchies.

Other types of monarchies include duchies, grand duchies, elective monarchy (where the monarch is actually elected), and non-sovereign monarchy.

4. Communism



In most cases, a communist state is based on the ideology of communism as taught by Marx and/or Lenin. However, some argue that these political systems are not true to the ideals espoused by these revolutionary thinkers. Communist states are often dominated by a single party, or a group of people. A planned economy is often part of the governing class, and in many cases resources are taken and then redistributed to others, at the top of the system. Sometimes communists call themselves “workers’ states” or “socialist,” but there are very real differences in their operation. In a lot of cases, citizens are required to do certain jobs, or have some of their life decisions — especially concerning where they can live and what jobs they can do. Communism is often considered an authoritarian political system.

5. Dictatorship



Another authoritarian form of government is the dictatorship. Normally, a dictator is the main individual ruling the country. While there are lackeys and others who work for the dictator, he or she makes most of the decisions, and usually has enforcers. In some cases, the political system is run by a small group of people. Dictators are not restricted by constitutions or parliaments. The governed are usually not consented in any way. Elections held are usually affairs in which the dictator is the only candidate.

One of the more common types of dictatorship is the military dictatorship, in which a military organization governs, running the political system. Sometimes, the military just exerts a great deal of pressure on the government, running the country de facto. In many cases, very few benefit from the decisions made in a dictatorship.

While authoritarian political systems have the advantage of quick decisions being made, many citizens prefer other forms of government — those that allow them greater participation in the political process.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

ANES Deadline Extended and ANES Meeting

The deadline to propose questions for inclusion on the American National
Election Studies (ANES) 2012 Time Series Study and the fourth survey of
The 2010-2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study has been
extended. Proposals will now be accepted until 3:00p.m. EDT, September
13 and should be sent to anes-proposals@electionstudies.org. Members of
the Online Commons community are encouraged to visit the Online Commons
(http://www.electionstudies.org/onlinecommons.htm) at any time to
comment on proposals. The Deadline to provide comments has been
extended to September 15, 2011. The deadline for revisions to proposals
is now 3:00p.m. EDT on September 22, 2011.

In changing some of the procedures and evaluation criteria from our
predecessors, we are seeing higher acceptance levels of the concepts and
questions that are being proposed. We encourage you to take this
opportunity to help shape the studies of the ANES. To review the
initial announcements and for additional information about the studies
and how to submit a proposal, please visit:
http://www.electionstudies.org/


We would also like to invite you to attend a public meeting of the
American National Election Studies at the APSA annual meeting in
Seattle! We will be providing updates on all aspects of the project
including the Online Commons, the EGSS studies, and the Time Series
study. The public meeting is scheduled for 10am on Saturday, September
3rd. We have been told that the location is to be the Washington State
Convention Center, Room 210, but please check the program when you
arrive in case there is a location change.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

APSA Short Course - Social Network Analysis

The APSA short course Introduction to Political Networks Concepts and Data is designed to serve as an introduction to the use of social network methods and concepts in political science; it is designed for students and scholars with no prior experience in network analysis. The day-long course (Wednesday, August 31, 9:30 am-5:00 pm) will cover four primary topics:
1) the practical uses of network concepts and analytic techniques in political science
2) basic network concepts and statistics
3) using surveys and other existing/potential sources to collect network data
4) software training.

The course will feature many examples of political network research drawn from the subfields of American, Comparative, International Relations and Public Policy to ensure that training is relevant to a wide range of substantive research interests. At the end of the day, all participants will have a chance to direct question about their own research to special guest James Fowler (UCSD), or one of the course instructors: Michael Heaney (University of Michigan), Amanda Murdie (Kansas State University), Meredith Rolfe (University of Oxford), or Anand E. Sokhey (University of Colorado at Boulder).

Please note: hands-on exercises will be conducted in UCInet, which is a Windows-based program, and is available as a free trial at: http://www.analytictech.com. Macintosh users will be able to use the program, but will need to run it through a Windows emulator.

Participants must register for the course prior to the meeting - information can be found at: http://www.apsanet.org/shortcourses/

Political Communication Business Meeting - APSA

Our annual business meeting is 4 weeks from today in Seattle. It is scheduled for 6:15 - 7:15 (location to be announced), with our annual reception to follow immediately afterward.

In addition to our annual awards and a few other items of business, we will discuss an offer we have received from Taylor & Francis outlining new and more favorable terms for our contract for Political Communication.

If you've not done so yet, please forward your nominations for section officer positions to Mike Xenos at xenos@wisc.edu (self-nominations accepted).

See you in Seattle.

Political Communication Division Call for Papers - ICA

International Communication Association, 2012 Conference,
Phoenix AZ, USA, 24-28 May 2012

The Political Communication Division of the International Communication Association supports research and theory development at the intersection of politics and communication. The division recognizes that political communication takes place in many settings, including within, between, and among individuals, small groups, organizations, cultures, and nations. Studies of communication dealing with government, political media, policy, political figures, citizens, campaigns, and advocacy groups are all within the purview of the division. Papers that address political communication problems at all levels of analysis using a variety of theories and methods are welcome. Panel proposals that are focused on a relevant topic, but that are diverse in terms of the methodologies, theoretical standpoints or nationalities of the presenters, are encouraged.

The division accepts only full papers (no longer than 25 pages, plus figures and references) and panel proposals. Submitters must delete all identifying information before submitting a paper. Papers must also include on the cover page as well as in the electronic submission from two to five topical keywords and at least one method keyword, selected from the list available on the division website (http://www.politicalcommunication.org/upcoming.html). Papers containing identifying information or lacking keywords from the division list will not undergo review. The number of submissions originating from the same author is limited to five by ICA regulations. Given limited space on the program, the division may accept only a single paper first-authored paper.

The division especially encourages participation from Latin America, Asia, and Africa, and will consider panel proposals using creative formats that advance division aims such as expanding participation and mentoring of student scholars. ICA is introducing one long session (2.5 hrs) per division, questions and suggestions for this session can be sent directly to the division program chair well ahead of the submission deadline.

For full details regarding the ICA electronic submission process and timeline, please consult the ICA website: http://www.icahdq.org/conferences/2012/2012%20cfp.pdf

Taylor & Francis Contract Proposal Update

Following a discussion at our annual business meeting in Boston, we have contacted the publisher and expressed our dissatisfaction regarding our contract terms for the journal. In response, the publisher has suggested a new contract that includes:

a. Increasing royalties from 10% to 20% (these royalties are split between the ICA and APSA divisions)
b. Increasing the editorial support from 17,000 to 30,000 USD per annum.
c. Online access for both divisions’ members at no cost to either group (we paid for this 3.00 USD per member per annum for this last year).

The ICA-APSA Joint Publications Committee was overall satisfied with the proposed terms. The APSA Political Communication Section will vote on this contract at their annual meeting next month. If there is no objection, our division will sign the new contract late in September.
If needed, we will vote on this issue electronically.

If you have concerns, questions, or reservations, please feel free to email
Yariv Tsfati, Chair,
Political Communication Division, ICA
.